Category: Marlaina’s Column

You Cant Evict an Idea (or a place)

Share

Thursday, 2 February. Martin Place. Good work team. Juxtaposition of the ‘messages of the mass media’ and ‘value of the world’ with the very people to which it refers and relies – real people with real passion, ideas, lives, hopes. You spend time in a place, sustained time, you engage people, there are challenges, victories. Workers, unwaged, young, old, housed or not, disabled and all, sustained on solidarity, not headlines.

Yet there is nothing MSM likes more than a story to sell ad space. Spend your precious $$ on LEDS Channel 7 – you’re going to need them.

The Occupy Sydney site lives on in Martin Place, come and say hello and join in. Free School this weekend as planned.

The power of Silence as a form of non violent direct action

Share

Trigger warning: first two videos below show aggressive and violent action which some may find distressing.

By now many of you have probably seen the video of UC Davis students being pepper sprayed point-blank after staging an Occupation of the Quad at their University – to protest against tuition fee increases, and also in solidarity with UC Berkley students who were brutalised by police at their own occupy site.

At UC Davis, police were brought in on the order of  UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi.

Assistant Professor Nathan Brown wrote an Open letter to UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi which is very powerful, describing the events, and demanding nothing less than her resignation for the brutality which these students were subject to on their own university grounds.

The next day, UC Davis students staged a silent shaming protest. Students lined the street as the Chancellor walked to her car after finishing work at night. The power in these student’s silence, the power in their simply being there, holding vigil, evidently shocked the Chancellor.

You can see a video of the silent shaming here. Note the presence built by a negation of sound, and the focus placed on the long walk of the Chancellor, slow, silent herself. Her face is stricken, her voice low and soft.

Yelling, slogan shouting etc. are externalisastions – and can be effective in certain contexts. The person or institution is subjected to that kind of action. Silence however, is unnerving because it demands the person or institution to internalise. There is no thing to react effectively to with aggression or scorn.

This is powerful stuff. Xeni Jardin wrote about her reaction to the silent protest and the events that preceded it on Boing Boing here and there is a very powerful eyewitness report here.

Dr. Gene Sharp’s famous book The Politics of NonViolent Action describes Silence as a method for NVDA – under Withdrawal and Renunciation. The book also lists 198 methods for non violent direct action, and how they are used used to thwart, denounce, change, oppose, challenge and resist governments or other oppressions.

Dr Gene Sharp was a nominated for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, which he lost to Barack Obama. A very interesting documentary of Dr Sharp’s work and its influence in activism particularly in America, was recently shown on SBS. You can watch it here.

Thoughts:

Governments, including Australia’s, are not monolithic or invulnerable, and they gain power through the participation and complicity of the people. A simple action to negate the power of the government, is to simply stop participating or complying with the expected actions or machinations the government demands.

The action, in its practice of solemnity and grief, is hard for people to resist as people experience this solemnity in other contexts. Silence is a strong socialised action. If people are keeping silence it is something which is socially respected. You can see that in the Chancellor’s response, defiance or anger would have seemed inappropriate or petulant. Silence creates a gravity you cannot dismiss.

Also see Susan Sontag: “The Aesthetics of Solitude” in Studies of Radical Will - some good notes are here.

So Occupy Sydney – when are we going to get silent?

Thanks to Frankie for talking this through with me.

Occupy Sydney Day 9 – notes and thoughts

Share

This is my opinion. I speak as an individual supporting Occupy Sydney and in solidarity with others worldwide.

So the police finally broke up the site at approx. 5am Sunday morning. Many people at site have written about their experience. I was not there having left a few hours before this time.

In light of this, I maybe have to get a bit poetic. Many people get very angry that they can’t be given a succinct answer to ‘what Occupy is about’. For me, it’s because the movement has yet to arrive at that point. That is okay. Sometimes I feel people demand an answer knowing it can’t be given. Maybe it feels easier to dismiss a growing or developing movement.

For me, Occupy is not a protest against a specific issue and has no finite set of demands. Rather it is a process or method of confronting fundamental and difficult questions, and facilitating critical and open discourse. It is people having the right to congregate peacefully in public to talk about where our society fail us, to work inclusively and to learn through participation.

Occupy challenges my assumptions and privilege. Occupy is not about emulating other countries, but being in solidarity. I know our situation is different and my discussions with people in the Sydney movement confirm this.

Occupy is a radical use of public space.

Occupy is a way to talk and meet different people without being bound by the walls of a building or an institution.

Occupy takes what is often private in out society, and makes it public.

Occupy is a method of democratic consensus and decision making in a society where *individuals* do not have a powerful voice.

Occupy allows us to discus a method for change

Occupy is about giving voice to the voiceless in our society. Most people, I think, understand that the 1% / 99% idea is not broadly representative, but it can be used to start a discussion: Who benefits, and who does not, in the current system.

Occupy is not perfect, and it does not claim to be.

Occupy is not the only method, and it doesn’t claim to be.

Occupy inspires me.

Inequality exists in Australia. We must be able to publicly talk about it. Australia is part of a global financial and political system, we do not exist in a bubble.

Some can be scared of public protest because it calls into question their own silence. Or their own judgements. If you believe that things that are wrong in society, you should stand up and say something/do something. Every voice matters, even one’s you don’t agree with. All methods should be encouraged, activism, letter writing, discussion, volunteering, sit-ins, protest. Occupy.

People congregating peacefully in public do not deserve violence. EVER.

Privilege shows itself most when you tell others their desire to speak out lacks legitimacy.